For correspondence:-  Gongling Zhao   Email: hnzgl@163.com

Received: 23 November 2015        Accepted: 1 June 2016        Published: 31 July 2016

Citation: Zhao G, Ren Y, Ma H. Extraction and characterization of Raphanus Sativus seed oil obtained by different methods. Trop J Pharm Res 2016; 15(7):1381-1385 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v15i7.5

© 2016 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

There is sufficient scientific evidence indicating that consumption of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) has positive influence on reduction of risks of a number of cancers and cardiovascular diseases, due to its content of some beneficial phytochemicals [1-3]. In traditional Chinese medicine, Raphanus sativus seed oil, which is rich in sulforaphene, is used to improve intestinal function and for treatment of digestive problems [4]. Studies have shown that oil yields from Raphanus sativus seeds can be as high as 35-40 %, making them potential new oil sources for food, medicine and cosmetic industries [5].

The quality and safety of natural extracts used as functional foods and medicines must conform with strict regulations related to residual levels of solvents. This necessitates the development and application of new extraction methods in food and pharmaceutical industries [6]. Super-critical carbon dioxide extraction (SCE) and sub-critical propane extraction (SPE) have been widely accepted and used in the extraction of oils and phytochemicals [7-8]. However, there are no reports so far on the use of these techniques for preparation of Raphanus sativus seed oil.  In this study, SE, SCE and SPE were used to extract oil from Raphanus sativus seeds. Oil yields, as well as physicochemical properties and bioactive ingredients of the oils were compared.

Materials and chemicals

Raphanus sativus seeds were purchased from Wuhan Vegetable Research Institute (Wuhan, China). Standard fatty acid methyl esters, tocopherols (α-, β-, γ-, and δ-isomers) and sulforaphene were procured from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). All other reagents were of analytical grade.

Determination of proximate composition

The content of moisture, ash, crude lipid, crude protein and crude fiber in the Raphanus sativus seeds were determined by the AOCS Official Methods [9] and expressed on a wet weight basis.

Solvent extraction (SE)

Raphanus sativus seed powder was prepared by grinding portions of the seeds in a clean coffee grinder for 15 s. The Raphanus sativus seed powder (1000 g) was subsequently soaked in 5000 mL of n-hexane for 5 h at 25 °C and filtered. The residue obtained was again extracted with 5000 mL of n-hexane. The supernatants from both steps were collected, combined and concentrated by using Rotary evaporator under vacuum at 40 °C to remove n-hexane. The oil obtained was weighed and stored at 4 °C prior to analysis.

Super-critical carbon dioxide extraction (SCE)

SCE extraction was performed on a 10 L-SFE system (Masson Nem, Guangzhou, China), consisting of an extraction vessel (10 L) and two separators. Raphanus sativus seed bran powder (1200 g) was put into the extractor and extracted at 26 mPa at 45 °C for 2.5 h. The operating conditions for the two separators were set at 7.5 mPa at 50 °C and 5 mPa at 30 °C, respectively. The flow rate of liquid CO₂ was 35 L/h. The oil in the separators was collected, weighed and stored at 4 °C for analysis.

Sub-critical propane extraction (SPE)

SPE extraction was performed on a CBE-5Lsubcritical fluid extraction system (Henan Yalinjie Biological Technology CO., LTD, Anyang, China). The Raphanus sativus seed bran powder (1200 g) was loaded into the extractor and extracted at a pressure of 0.4 mPa and temperature of 40 ^oC for 2.5h. Evaporating temperature was set at 40 °C. The resultant oil in the separators was collected, weighed and stored at 4 °C prior to analysis.

Determination of physicochemical properties

The density, refractive index, saponification value and peroxide value of each of the oils were measured by the IUPAC Methods [10] Oil color was determined according to the AOCS Official Method [11].

Determination of fatty acid composition

Fatty acid compositions of the oil samples were analyzed according to the IUPAC method 2.302 [12], with an Agilent 6890N gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies Co., Ltd.), fitted with a flame ionization detector. The column used was a DB-FFAP capillary column; the film thickness was 0.25 μm. The length of the column was 30 m and its internal diameter was 0.32 mm. The column, injector, and detector temperatures were set at 180, 230, and 230 °C, respectively. The flow rate of the N₂ carrier gas with a split ratio of 1:20 was set at 70 mL/min.

Determination of tocopherol composition

Tocopherol (α-, β- and γ- isomers) contents of the oils were estimated according to the method of Shi et al [13], using an LC-10Avp High Performance Liquid Chromatography (Shimadzu, Japan), fitted with a RF-10AXL fluorescence detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Each oil was dissolved in n-hexane and eluted on a silica column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) (Dalian Yilite, Dalian, China) with n-hexane:isopropyl ether (99:1,v/v ratio) at 0.8 mL/min. Column temperature was set at 40 °C.

Determination of sulforaphene content

To quantify sulforaphene, a gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used [14,15]. An Agilent 7890 coupled with an Agilent 5975C mass selective detector and a fused silica capillary column (HP-5, 30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm of film thickness) were employed. Oven temperature was set at 80 °C for 1 min, then increased to 150 °C at the rate of 20 °C/min and then to 280 °C at the rate of 40 °C/min and held at 280 °C for 3 min. Injector temperature was at 250 °C; carrier gas (helium) was at a flow rate of 1 mL/min; ionization energy was 70 eV; mass range was 40–500 m/z and scan mode was on electron impact. One microliter of the sample was injected with a split ratio of 1:20, and the data were recorded and processed by Xcalibur software.

Determination of oil oxidative stability

The oxidative stabilities of the oils were determined on a 743 Rancimat analyzer (Metrohm, Switzerland) [16]. Each oil sample (5 g) was subjected to oxidation at 110 °C with air flow rate of 20 L/h. The induction period was recorded automatically.

Proximate composition

The proximate composition of Raphanus sativus seed is shown in below. The crude lipid content was 35.46 %, which is higher than that of soya bean.

Oil yield

The different extracting methods yielded different levels of oil. Traditional SE method with n-hexane for 5 h at 25 °C gave an oil yield of 27.17 % (w/w). The yield from SCE method at 26 mPa in 45 °C for 2.5 h was 24.10 % (w/w) while SPE method at 0.4 mPa in 40°C for 2.5 h was 33.69 % (w/w).

Traditional physicochemical properties

The traditional physicochemical properties of the oils obtained by different methods are shown in . The oils obtained by SE, SCE and SPE have similar density, refractive index, saponification value and peroxide value.

For the difference of pigment solubilities in n-hexane, supercritical carbon dioxide and subcritical propane, the obtained oils showed different color values. The Y and R values of the oil obtained by SPE were higher than those of SE and SCE.

Fatty acid composition

The fatty acid compositions of the oils obtained by different methods are shown in . Ten fatty acids at different quantities were detected in all samples. Although the oils were extracted by different methods, their difference in fatty acid composition was not significant (p < 0.05). The oleic (C18:1), linoleic (C18:2), linolenic (C18:3) and erucic (C22:1) acids were the main unsaturated fatty acids, which accounted for about 90 % of total fatty acids. Saturated fatty acids such as palmitic (C16:0), stearic (C18:0) and docosanoic (C22:0) acids could be found.

Sulforaphene content

The sulforaphene content of the oil obtained by SCE was the highest (53.34 mg/kg), followed by SPE and SE, which yielded 27.65 and 13.72 mg/kg respectively.

Oil oxidative stability

The induction periods of the oils obtained by SE, SCE and SPE were 4.99, 38.51 and 10.08 h respectively. The oxidative stability of oil from SCE was significantly higher than that from SE or SPE. This may be attributed to the high contents of tocopherol and sulforaphene in the SCE oil.

Traditional extraction methods which use large amounts of toxic solvents to extract plant oils have many drawbacks, such as time factor, residual solvents in oils, and low output rate. Modern extraction methods can solve these problems. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction (SCE) and subcritical propane extraction (SPE) are the most promising technologies for overcoming the disadvantages of traditional extraction protocols [17]. In this study, three extraction methods (SE, SCE and SPE) were used to extract Raphanus sativus seed oil.

The physicochemical properties and bioactive ingredients of the resultant oils were compared. SPE was superior to SCE with respect to extraction yield of oil from Raphanus sativus seeds. This is related to the fact that subcritical propane is a better solvent for triacylglycerols than supercritical carbon dioxide [18,19]. The effect of the extraction methods on traditional physicochemical properties (density, refractive index, saponification value, peroxide value and iodine value) was not significant. However, the peroxide values of SE, SCE and SPE were lower than those generally recommended for commercial vegetable oils [20].

The color of the oil obtained by SPE was deeper than that of SE or SCE, which implies that it had higher contents of natural pigments (such as carotenoids). The oils obtained by the different extraction methods showed similar fatty acid compositions, with high erucic acid content, which could partly explain the medicinal importance of Raphanus sativus seed oil in Chinese traditional medicine. Although the oil yield of SPE was the highest, its bioactive ingredients (tocopherol and sulforaphene) were lower than those of SCE, which suggests that its extraction potential was lower than that of SCE. The high contents of tocopherol and sulforaphene probably conferred high oxidative stability on the oil obtained by SCE.

The effects of the three extraction methods on traditional physicochemical properties and fatty acid compositions of the resultant oils are not significant. Due to its high oxidative stability and selectivity for tocopherol and sulforaphene, SCE appears to be the most suitable method for preparing medicinal Raphanus sativus seed oil.